SHAW, LICITRA, EISENBERG, ESERNIO & SCHWARTZ v. FRIEDMAN


170 A.D.2d 1048 (1991)

Shaw, Licitra, Eisenberg, Esernio & Schwartz, P. C., Respondent, v. Ari Friedman, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

February 1, 1991


Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion denied.

Memorandum:

Special Term erred in granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. Although plaintiff has met its burden of establishing a prima facie case for an account stated (see, CPLR 3212 [b]), defendant has met his burden of raising a triable issue of fact by submitting proof in admissible form that the account had been assigned prior...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases