CITY OF CRYSTAL POLICE RELIEF v. CRYSTAL

No. C7-91-914.

477 N.W.2d 728 (1991)

CITY OF CRYSTAL POLICE RELIEF ASSOCIATION, a Minnesota corporation, Respondent, v. CITY OF CRYSTAL, a municipal corporation, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied January 17, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank J. Walz, Caryn S. Glover, Best & Flanagan, Minneapolis, for respondent.

John M. LeFevre, Corrine A. Heine, Holmes & Graven, Chartered, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Stanley G. Peskar, Carla Heyl, St. Paul, for Amicus Curiae League of Minnesota Cities.

Roger A. Peterson, Ronald G. Marks, Gregory A. Trost, Peterson, Engberg & Peterson, Minneapolis, for Amicus Curiae Minnesota Police Pension Council.

Considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and PETERSON and LOMMEN, JJ.


OPINION

LOMMEN, Judge.*

Appellant challenges the trial court's determination that the "regular monthly salary of a first grade patrolman" includes educational incentive pay when determining pension deductions under 1969 Minn. Laws ch. 1087, § 1.

FACTS

The City of Crystal Police Relief Association (Association) is a Minnesota corporation organized to create, maintain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases