1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 821 P.2d
  5. 821 P.2d 319 (1991)
 

DURRANT v. CHRISTENSEN

No. 18817.

821 P.2d 319 (1991)

120 Idaho 886

Orvil DURRANT and Faye Durrant, husband and wife; Kenneth W. Sellers, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Ruby CHRISTENSEN, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Pocatello, September 1991 Term.

November 25, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kerr Law Office, Blackfoot, for defendant-appellant. Robert J. Kerr, Jr., argued.

Whittier, McDougall, Souza, Murray & Clark, Chartered, Pocatello, for plaintiffs-respondents. John C. Souza, argued.

JOHNSON, Justice.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying sanctions pursuant to I.R.C.P. 11(a)(1). We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion.

I.

THE BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS.

This is the second appeal to this Court in this case. The decision in the first appeal is Durrant v. Christensen, 117 Idaho 70,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases