1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 476 N.W.2d
  5. 476 N.W.2d 662 (1991)
 

STATE v. ELLIS

No. C0-90-2512.

476 N.W.2d 662 (1991)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Andrew ELLIS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied December 13, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Robert Alfton, City Atty., and Steven M. Tallen, Holmes & Graven, Sp. Asst. City Atty., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Robert J. Zohlmann, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and PETERSON, and AMUNDSON, JJ.

OPINION

AMUNDSON, Judge.

Appellant claims Minneapolis, Minn., Code of Ordinances § 244.500 (1982) and § 244.530 (1985), are unconstitutionally vague on their face and as applied. He also contends Minneapolis, Minn.Code of Ordinances § 87.90(f) (1978) does not make it a crime to fail to comply with a written order under the Minneapolis Housing Maintenance Code. Further, he argues he was denied a fair trial and the evidence was insufficient...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases