ETUGH v. U.S. I.N.S.

No. 90-3240.

921 F.2d 36 (1990)

William Azubuike ETUGH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided October 15, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

V. Pinnock Bailey, II, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.

Mark C. Walters, Alice M. Smith, Richard M. Evans, and Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges.


Submitted Under Third Circuit Rule 12(6) October 12, 1990.

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

The Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") dismissed petitioner's motion to reopen his deportation proceedings because petitioner failed to establish prima facie that he was eligible for political asylum or that deportation should be withheld under sections 208 and 243(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("Act"), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases