1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 921 F.2d
  5. 921 F.2d 21 (1990)
 

KLINGHOFFER v. S.N.C. ACHILLE LAURO ED ALTRI-GESTIONE MOTONAVE ACHILLE LAURO IN AMMINISTRAZIONE STRAORDINARIA

No. 90-9060.

921 F.2d 21 (1990)

Ilsa KLINGHOFFER and Lisa Klinghoffer Arbitter, as Co-Executrixes of the Estates of Leon and Marilyn Klinghoffer, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. S.N.C. ACHILLE LAURO ED ALTRI-GESTIONE MOTONAVE ACHILLE LAURO IN AMMINISTRAZIONE STRAORDINARIA, et al., Defendants. Sophie CHASSER, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. ACHILLE LAURO LINES, et al., Defendants. Viola MESKIN, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. ACHILLE LAURO LINES, et al., Defendants. Donald SAIRE, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. ACHILLE LAURO ED ALTRI-GESTIONE M/N ACHILLE LAURO S.N.C., et al., Defendants. Frank R. HODES and Mildred Hodes, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. PALESTINE LIBERATION ORGANIZATION, An Unincorporated Association, John Doe, President, PLO, and Richard Roe, Treasurer, PLO, Defendants-Petitioners. Donald E. SAIRE and Anna G. Saire, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. PALESTINE LIBERATION ORGANIZATION, and John Doe as President and Don Roe as Treasurer of The Palestine Liberation Organization, Defendants-Petitioners.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided December 7, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ramsey Clark, Lawrence W. Schilling, New York City, for defendant-petitioner The Palestine Liberation Organization.

Steven E. Obus, Jay D. Fischer, Juliet Sarkessian, Proskauer Rose Goetz & Mendelsohn, New York City, for plaintiffs-respondents Ilsa Klinghoffer and Lisa Klinghoffer Arbitter.

Rodney E. Gould, Rubin, Hay & Gould, P.C., Framingham, Mass., for plaintiff-respondent Crown Travel.

Before FEINBERG, TIMBERS and MINER, Circuit Judges.

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:

The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) seeks leave to appeal an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Louis L. Stanton, J., denying the PLO's motion to dismiss the complaints and third-party complaints against it. The district court subsequently granted the PLO's motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) for certification of the order for interlocutory appeal, and the PLO now seeks leave from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases