OPINION ON STATE'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW AND APPELLANT'S CROSS-PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
WHITE, Judge.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of burglary of a habitation. The jury assessed his punishment at twenty-five years imprisonment. On direct appeal appellant argued the trial court committed error by not instructing the jury that one of the State's witnesses was an accomplice as a matter of law. Appellant's trial counsel
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.