COOTER & GELL v. HARTMARX CORP.

No. 89-275.

496 U.S. 384 (1990)

COOTER & GELL v. HARTMARX CORP. ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 11, 1990


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen A. Saltzburg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Dale A. Cooter and Donna S. Mangold.

Richard J. Favretto argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Kenneth S. Geller, Mark W. Ryan, Evan M. Tager, and Carey M. Stein.*

Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the Legal Affairs Council by Wyatt B. Durrette, Jr., and Bradley B. Cavedo; and for the Washington Legal Foundation by Daniel J. Popeo, Paul D. Kamenar, and Richard A. Samp.

Briefs of amici curiae were filed for the Association of Trial Lawyers of America by Gregory P. Joseph, Russ M. Herman, and Jeffrey Robert White; for the Chicago Council of Lawyers by Thomas R. Meites; and for the Plaintiff Employment Lawyers Association by Barry D. Roseman.


JUSTICE O'CONNOR delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case presents three issues related to the application of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: whether a district court may impose Rule 11 sanctions on a plaintiff who has voluntarily dismissed his complaint pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; what constitutes the appropriate standard of appellate review of a district court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases