1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 163 A.D.2d
  5. 163 A.D.2d 269 (1990)
 

BIENZ v. CENT. SUFFOLK HOSP.

163 A.D.2d 269 (1990)

Marjorie Bienz, Individually and as Executrix of Harold T. Bienz, Deceased, Respondent, v. Central Suffolk Hospital et al., Defendants, and Victor N. Ambruoso, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

July 2, 1990

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The question presented on appeal, as it is phrased by the appellant in his brief, is "[w]hether a telephone call to a physician's office for the purpose of initiating treatment is sufficiently [sic] to create a physician-client relationship". The appellant's argument is based on his assertion that, as a matter of law, such a communication is insufficient to create the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases