MATTER OF MARTIN


118 N.J. 239 (1990)

571 A.2d 288

IN THE MATTER OF ARTHUR N. MARTIN, JR., AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 23, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Janasie, Deputy Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of Office of Attorney Ethics.

Theodore V. Wells, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Lowenstein, Sandler, Kohl, Fisher & Boylan, attorneys).


PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary action is based on eight client complaints charging respondent with gross negligence, neglect, and other unethical conduct. Those complaints resulted in four separate recommendations by the District V-A Ethics Committee. The Disciplinary Review Board (DRB or Board) consolidated those matters for oral argument and determined that respondent was grossly negligent in the representation of his client...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases