1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 49 Ohio
  5. 49 Ohio St. 3d 289 (1990)
 

SMITH v. THE 10TH INNING, INC.

No. 88-1932.

49 Ohio St. 3d 289 (1990)

SMITH ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE 10TH INNING, INC., APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 21, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sindell, Rubenstein, Einbund, Pavlik, Novak & Celebrezze, William J. Novak and Terry A. Bryer, for appellants.

Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder Co., L.P.A., Todd M. Raskin and John T. McLandrich, for appellee.

SWEENEY, J.

The precise question presented for our determination is whether an intoxicated patron has a cause of action for damages under R.C. 4301.22(B)1 against the permit holder that sold him or her the alcoholic beverages. Since we believe that public policy considerations strongly militate against the allowance of such an action, we answer this question in the negative, thereby affirming the decision of the court of appeals below...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases