IN RE PETITION OF BROWN

No. 89-1396.

49 Ohio St. 3d 222 (1990)

IN RE PETITION OF BROWN FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 7, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward C. Brown, pro se.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, and Alexander G. Thomas, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Petitioner has no cause of action either by writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum or writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum. The former issues to bring a prisoner before a court to prosecute in a jurisdiction other than where he is imprisoned and has no application in this case. The latter issues to inquire into illegal restraint of liberty. Neither will issue simply to grant a new first appeal as of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases