IN RE WOODRUFF

No. 90-1095.

919 F.2d 1575 (1990)

In re Richard E. WOODRUFF.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

November 20, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick F. Bright, Bright & Lorig, P.C., Los Angeles, Cal., argued, for appellant.

Richard E. Schafer, Associate Sol., Office of the Sol., Arlington, Va., argued for appellee. With him on the brief was Fred E. McKelvey, Sol.

Before RICH and PLAGER, Circuit Judges, and CONTI, Judge.


RICH, Circuit Judge.

Woodruff appeals from the September 7, 1989 decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board), Appeal No. 86-2814, affirming the rejection of claims 27-34 in Ser. No. 741,610 as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Woodruff's patent application is entitled "Method for Inhibiting Fungal Growth on Refrigerated Fresh Fruits and Vegetables." It discloses...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases