ASTOR CHAUFFEURED LIMOUSINE v. RUNNFELDT INV.

Nos. 89-1631, 89-1654.

910 F.2d 1540 (1990)

ASTOR CHAUFFEURED LIMOUSINE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. RUNNFELDT INVESTMENT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 24, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael H. Moirano, Nisen & Elliott, Shelly B. Kulwin, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellant-cross-appellee.

Gary M. Elden, George R. Dougherty, Philip C. Stahl, Grippo & Elden, Chicago, Ill., for defendants-appellees-cross-appellants.

Before POSNER and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges, and FAIRCHILD, Senior Circuit Judge.


EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

Limousine companies, like many law firms, flourish to the extent they have stable lists of corporate clients. Walk-in business is not enough to keep a firm solvent. Centennial Custom Limousine Service, which offered limousine service in Chicago, experienced the problem first hand. Two years of negative profits convinced its parent, Runnfeldt Investment Corporation, that new clients had to be obtained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases