RAIFORD v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH

No. 89-8051.

903 F.2d 1410 (1990)

Morgan B. RAIFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., Thomas F. Morris, Defendants-Appellees. Bernice B. RAIFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., Thomas F. Morris, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 22, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Parker, Parker and Day, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.

Paul W. Stivers, Rogers & Hardin, Dan F. Laney, III, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, VANCE, Circuit Judge, and ALLGOOD, Senior District Judge.


TJOFLAT, Chief Judge:

On April 8, 1983, appellants, Morgan and Bernice Raiford (the Raifords), filed separate but identical complaints in federal district court alleging that appellees Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. and Thomas Morris (Merrill Lynch)1 had defrauded the Raifords in violation of section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) (1988), Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (1988...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases