CHICANO EDUC. & MANPOWER SERV. v. DEPT. OF LABOR

Nos. 88-7187, 89-70208.

909 F.2d 1320 (1990)

CHICANO EDUCATION AND MANPOWER SERVICES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent. SEATTLE-KING COUNTY EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING CONSORTIUM (Hereinafter "Consortium"), Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided July 27, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steve Fredrickson, Evergreen Legal Services, Seattle, Wash., for petitioner Chicano Educ. and Manpower Services.

Robert H. Alsdorf, Armstrong, Alsdorf, Bradbury & Maier, Seattle, Wash., for petitioner Seattle-King County Employment and Training Consortium.

Charles I. Hadden, Anne Payne Fuggett and Jeffrey A. Hennemuth, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before WRIGHT, WALLACE and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.


KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:

Chicano Education and Manpower Services (CEMS) and the Seattle-King County Employment and Training Consortium (Consortium) petition for review of a decision of the Secretary of Labor holding them jointly and severally liable for repayment of funds spent in violation of Department of Labor regulations. This is the latest episode in the Department's seven-year quest to recover $105,000 it spent on adult education.

Facts

CEMS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases