RUOCCO v. BATEMAN, EICHLER, HILL, RICHARDS, INC.

No. 88-6655.

903 F.2d 1232 (1990)

John D. RUOCCO, on behalf of himself and as the representative of a class of persons similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BATEMAN, EICHLER, HILL, RICHARDS, INCORPORATED, John R. Bolin, Theodore Prush, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided May 18, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig B. Jorgensen, Jon L. Rewinski, Louis W. Karlin, Kindel & Anderson, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellants.

J. Michael Hennigan, Richard M. Callahan, Jr., Hennigan & Mercer, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before THOMPSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and MARSH, District Judge.


MARSH, District Judge:

This action involves claims by John Ruocco, on behalf of himself and current and former Bateman, Eichler, Hill, Richards, Inc., et al., ("BEHR") employees who participated in BEHR's long-term disability plan between January 1, 1982 and December 30, 1984. The plaintiff class claims that BEHR violated its fiduciary duties, the Employee Retirement Income and Security Act ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (1982 & Supp. V 1987), section...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases