BROADVIEW S. & L. CO. v. RIESTENBERG

No. 88-2070.

49 Ohio St. 3d 133 (1990)

BROADVIEW SAVINGS & LOAN COMPANY v. RIESTENBERG.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 28, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John D. Wheeler, for petitioner.

John M. Riestenberg, pro se.

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease and Steven W. Mershon, for amicus curiae.


Per Curiam.

Having considered all the arguments in the case, we, nevertheless, exercise our discretion under Sections 1 and 9 of Rule XVI of the Supreme Court Rules of Practice and decline to answer the question. Since the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has given its answer, we believe it would be inappropriate to intervene between the federal appellate and district courts. This decision does not preclude the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals from seeking our...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases