IN RE CONVERTIBLE ROWING EXERCISER PATENT LIT.

Miscellaneous No. 268.

903 F.2d 822 (1990)

In re CONVERTIBLE ROWING EXERCISER PATENT LITIGATION.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Suggestion for Rehearing Declined May 14, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan I. Cantor and Harold J. Birch, Banner, Birch, McKie & Beckett, of Washington, D.C., and Bruce M. Stargatt and Richard Morse, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, of Wilmington, Del., represented the plaintiffs and respondents.

Melvin F. Jager and Richard A. Kaplan, William Brinks Olds Hofer Gilson & Lione, of Chicago, Ill., represented defendant Ajay Enterprises Corp.

Thomas J. Rossa, Trask, Britt & Rossa, of Salt Lake City, Utah, represented defendant Weslo, Inc.

Lyn M. Schlitt and James A. Toupin, Office of General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, of Washington, D.C., represented the U.S. International Trade Commission.

Before ARCHER, Circuit Judge, BALDWIN and BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judges.


Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined May 14, 1990.

PETITION FOR REHEARING

ARCHER, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Ajay Enterprises Corporation, et al. (Ajay) has petitioned for rehearing and suggested in banc consideration1 of the court's April 4, 1990 order denying their petition for permission to appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), (c).

Ajay's petition for rehearing is frivolous. First, as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases