1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 49 Ohio
  5. 49 Ohio St. 3d 123 (1990)
 

OHIO BELL TEL. CO. v. PUB. UTIL. COMM.

Nos. 87-2208 and 88-1282.

49 Ohio St. 3d 123 (1990)

OHIO BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 28, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald W. Morrison and Charles S. Rawlings, for appellant.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, Robert S. Tongren and Thomas W. McNamee, for appellee.

Emens, Hurd, Kegler & Ritter Co., L.P.A., Samuel C. Randazzo, John C. McDonald and Roger P. Sugarman, for intervening appellee.

Per Curiam.

Ohio Bell contends the commission erred in finding that it provided Carpet Color with legally inadequate telephone service. We disagree and affirm the orders of the commission.

In the proceeding below, the burden rested upon Carpet Color to demonstrate, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the telephone service provided by Ohio Bell was inadequate. See, e.g., Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1984),

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases