1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 903 F.2d
  5. 903 F.2d 796 (1990)
 

PAC-TEC, INC. v. AMERACE CORP.

Nos. 89-1329, 89-1692.

903 F.2d 796 (1990)

PAC-TEC, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERACE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 9, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Owen E. Perry of Reising, Ethington, Barnard, Perry & Milton, Troy, Mich., argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Jeanne-Marie Buiteweg and Richard W. Hoffmann.

Ronald A. Sandler of Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Chicago, Ill., argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Sandra B. Weiss. Of counsel were Charles Rutherford, Robert L. Kelly and Dykema Gossett, Detroit, Mich.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge, and PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

Pac-Tec, Inc. (Pac-Tec) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, No. 86CV73873DT (DeMascio, J.), that 13 claims of Amerace Corporation's (Amerace) patent 4,155,666 ('666) and 23 claims of Amerace's patent 4,195,945 ('945) were infringed and not invalid. Pac-Tec further appeals from an order denying its motion for recusal. Amerace seeks sanctions against Pac-Tec pursuant to Rule 38, Fed.R...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases