WILSON SPORTING GOODS CO. v. DAVID GEOFFREY & ASSOC.

Nos. 89-1554, 89-1555.

904 F.2d 677 (1990)

WILSON SPORTING GOODS CO., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID GEOFFREY & ASSOCIATES d/b/a Slazenger, and Dunlop Slazenger Corporation aka Dunlop Sports Corporation, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied July 5, 1990.

Suggestion for Rehearing Declined July 27, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Chestnut, Tilton, Fallon, Lungmus and Chestnut, Chicago, Ill., argued, for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief, was Vasilios D. Dossas.

David B. Tulchin, Sullivan and Cromwell, New York City, argued, for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief, were James H. Carter, John L. Hardiman and Michael J. Farrell. Also on the brief, was Anthony M. Lorusso, Lorusso and Loud, Boston, Mass., of counsel.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, RICH, Circuit Judge, and COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge.


Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined July 27, 1990.

RICH, Circuit Judge.

These appeals, consolidated by agreement, are from judgments of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina in two actions brought by Wilson Sporting Goods Co. (Wilson) for infringement of United States Patent 4,560,168 ('168), entitled "Golf Ball." Trial was before a United States Magistrate by consent. In the first action, the magistrate entered judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases