1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 903 F.2d
  5. 903 F.2d 635 (1990)
 

CLOVIS UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. v. CA. OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

Nos. 86-2747, 86-2825, 86-2842, 87-1537 and 87-1554.

903 F.2d 635 (1990)

CLOVIS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS; and Ronald Diedrich, Hearing Officer, Defendants-Appellees, William Honig, California State Superintendent of Public Instruction; and California State Department of Education, Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants. Michelle Shorey, Real Party in Interest-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submission Vacated April 7, 1988.

Resubmitted March 12, 1990.

Decided May 3, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Diana K. Smith, Lozano Smith Smith & Woliver, San Francisco, Cal., for Clovis Unified School Dist., plaintiff-appellant and cross-appellee.

Joyce Eckrem and Michael E. Hersher, California State Dept. of Educ., Sacramento, Cal., for William Honig, California State Superintendent of Public Instruction, and the California State Dept. of Educ., defendants-appellees and cross-appellants.

John K. Van de Kamp, Atty. Gen., and Richard M. Frank and Paul Dobson, Supervising Deputy Attys. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., for Michelle Shorey, Real Party in Interest, defendant-appellee and cross-appellant, and for the California Office of Administrative Hearings and Ronald Diedrich, Hearing Officer, defendants-appellees.

Ronald D. Wenkart, Costa Mesa, Cal., for the Anaheim City School Dist., et al., Amicus.

Andrea M. Miller, Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard, Sacramento, Cal., for the California Ass'n of School Boards, Amicus.

Before SCHROEDER, POOLE and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

INTRODUCTION

Three of the appeals addressed in this opinion are taken from the District Court's decision ordering Clovis Unified School District to pay for the placement of real-party-in-interest Michelle Shorey in King's View Hospital as a residential placement under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. (Education of the Handicapped Act, EHA, the Act). Two of the appeals are taken from the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases