HARE v. HARE

No. 01-89-00817-CV.

786 S.W.2d 747 (1990)

Otis Leroy HARE v. Marie Kindle HARE.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.).

Rehearing Denied February 15, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sally A. Jones, Elliott, Heinlein & Zimmerman, Crosby, for appellant.

Patrice McDonald and Stephenie Beridon, Carll McDonald & Stibbs, The Woodlands, for appellee.

Before EVANS, C.J., and COHEN and HUGHES, JJ.


OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellee, Marie Kindle Hare, asks this Court to dismiss the appeal. Appellee asserts that because she did not receive notice of appellant's intent to appeal, Tex.R. App.P. 46(d), she was not able to obtain a ruling on her motion for temporary orders pending appeal prior to the time the court lost its plenary power.

Rule 46(d), Tex.R.App.P., requires that counsel for appellant give notification to all parties of the filing of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases