1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 917 F.2d
  5. 917 F.2d 544 (1990)
 

MANVILLE SALES CORP. v. PARAMOUNT SYSTEMS, INC.

Nos. 90-1148, 90-1175.

917 F.2d 544 (1990)

MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Cross-Appellant, v. PARAMOUNT SYSTEMS, INC., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. Disimone, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

October 23, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernie L. Brooks, Brooks & Kushman, Southfield, Mich., argued for plaintiff/cross-appellant. With him on the brief was Thomas A. Lewry.

Manny D. Pokotilow, Caesar, Rivise, Bernstein, Cohen & Pokotilow, Ltd., Philadelphia, Pa., argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief were Alan H. Bernstein and Max Goldman.

Before ARCHER, MICHEL, and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges.

MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

Paramount Systems, Inc. (Paramount), Robert S. Butterworth, and Anthony J. DiSimone appeal the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania's September 7, 1989, judgment awarding Manville Sales Corporation (Manville) damages for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 3,847,333 (the '333 patent). Manville Sales Corp. v. Paramount Sys., Inc., 14 USPQ2d 1291, 1989 WL 104953 (E...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases