COE v. THURMAN

No. 90-55128.

922 F.2d 528 (1990)

Donald O. COE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Otis THURMAN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided December 28, 1990.

Supplemental Opinion Filed February 15, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald O. Coe, Chino, Cal., pro se.

Donald F. Roeschke, Deputy Atty. Gen. of California, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent-appellee.

Before NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, District Judge.


DOROTHY W. NELSON, Circuit Judge:

Donald Coe, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Coe claims that he has been denied due process of law by the failure of the California Court of Appeal to review his conviction in a timely and effective manner. He also claims that he has been denied effective assistance of counsel. We agree that the excessive delay in this case has violated his right to due process...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases