JOYCE v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP.

No. 88-2049.

49 Ohio St. 3d 93 (1990)

JOYCE, APPELLEE, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION; HALSEY ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 28, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Green & Green and Peter F. von Meister, for appellee.

Turner, Granzow & Hollenkamp and David F. Rudwall, for appellants.


MOYER, C.J.

The first issue for our disposition is whether the court of appeals properly construed the trial court's action as a response to defendants' Civ. R. 12(B)(6) motion, rather than as a response to defendants' motion for a directed verdict.

Defendants-appellants contend that it is error to treat a directed verdict entered at the conclusion of plaintiff's case as a motion to dismiss under Civ. R. 12(B)(6).

Civ. R. 50(A)(4) provides in part...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases