1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 905 F.2d
  5. 905 F.2d 386 (1990)
 

LAITRAM CORPORATION v. CAMBRIDGE WIRE CLOTH COMPANY

No. 90-1129.

905 F.2d 386 (1990)

The LAITRAM CORPORATION & Intralox, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The CAMBRIDGE WIRE CLOTH COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 11, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Hayes, Weingarten, Schurgin, Gagnebin & Hayes, of Boston, Mass., argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief, was Victor B. Lebovici.

William T. Enos, Bernard, Rothwell & Brown, P.C., of Washington, D.C., argued, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief, was G. Franklin Rothwell.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge, and BROWNING, District Judge.

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

ORDER

The parties' submission of woefully inadequate and improper briefs has forced the court to take the unusual step of ordering that the case be rebriefed.

The briefs include a plethora of deviations from the rules of proper appellate practice. By way of example, we note here a few deviations. Because this list is not exhaustive the parties should in rewriting their briefs carefully consider each statement.

Each party...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases