1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 916 F.2d
  5. 916 F.2d 356 (1990)
 

HOOSIC v. FEDDERS

No. 89-3647.

916 F.2d 356 (1990)

Charlotte and Thomas P. HOOSIC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mary D. FEDDERS, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided October 10, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Horrigan, Connie M. Wymer, Brian P. Downey (argued), Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Robert B. Daane (argued), Vogelgesang, Howes, Lindamood & Brunn, Canton, Ohio, for defendant-appellee.

Before KEITH and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges, and JORDAN, District Judge.

KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants, Charlotte and Thomas P. Hoosic (appellants), appealed the denial of their post-verdict motion for a new trial in this diversity tort action arising out of an automobile accident. In their complaint, appellants alleged that defendant-appellee, Mary D. Fedders (appellee), negligently operated her vehicle, causing appellant Charlotte Hoosic to lose control of her automobile and collide with a tree, thereby sustaining serious...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases