1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 900 F.2d
  5. 900 F.2d 351 (1990)
 

MONROE COMMUNICATIONS CORP. v. F.C.C.

No. 89-1092.

900 F.2d 351 (1990)

MONROE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Respondent, Harriscope of Chicago, Inc., et al., a Joint Venture d/b/a Video 44, Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided April 10, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry F. Cole, with whom Gene A. Bechtel, was on the brief, for petitioner.

Sue Ann Preskill, Counsel, F.C.C., with whom Robert L. Pettit, Gen. Counsel, and Daniel M. Armstrong, Associate Gen. Counsel, F.C.C., were on the brief, for respondent. Daniel S. Killory, Attorney, F.C.C., also entered an appearance for respondent.

N. Frank Wiggins, with whom Stanley B. Cohen and J. Brian De Boice were on the brief, for intervenors.

Before WALD, Chief Judge, SILBERMAN and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.

SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:

Monroe Communications Corporation ("Monroe") petitions this Court for review of a decision of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or the "Commission") awarding Video 44 ("the station") a renewal of its license to operate station WSNS-TV in Chicago, Illinois, and to deny Monroe's mutually exclusive application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases