1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 909 F.2d
  5. 909 F.2d 339 (1990)
 

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ("EDISON") v. JURA

Nos. 87-7477, 87-7486, 87-7499 and 87-7511.

909 F.2d 339 (1990)

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ("EDISON"); and Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles, Public Service Department of the City of Burbank, Public Service Department of the City of Glendale, and Water and Power Department of the City of Pasadena (Collectively "LADWP, et al."), Petitioner, v. James JURA, Administrator, Bonneville Power Administration, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondents, Portland General Electric Company, Respondent-Intervenor. Respondent-Intervenor. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner, v. BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondents. CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondents. ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AGENCY CUSTOMERS, Petitioner, v. BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION; James Jura, Administrator, Bonneville Power Administration, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondents.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided July 13, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan Blees, Sacramento, Cal., for California Energy Com'n.

John D. McGrane, Reid and Priest, Washington, D.C., for Southern California Edison Co.

Peter G. Fairchild, San Francisco, Cal., for California Public Utilities Com'n.

Max M. Miller, Jr., Tonken, Torp, Galen, et al., Portland, Or., for Northwest Parties.

Marybeth VanBuren, Portland, Or., for Bonneville Power Admin.

Joanne Leveque, Washington, D.C., for F.E.R.C.

Before CANBY, THOMPSON and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

A coalition of Northwest utility companies and industrial purchasers of electricity challenges the Bonneville Power Administration's adoption of a schedule of rates for energy sold to customers outside the Northwest region. The Northwest parties claim that the design of the schedule is inconsistent with Bonneville's statutory obligation to attempt to recover costs. Several California utility companies, joined by California's Energy and Public...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases