CAMPAGNOLA v. MULHOLLAND


76 N.Y.2d 38 (1990)

Kathleen Campagnola et al., Respondents, v. Mulholland, Minion & Roe et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided May 8, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter L. Contini for appellants.

Harry Organek for respondents.

Judges KAYE, TITONE and BELLACOSA concur with Judge ALEXANDER; Judge KAYE concurs in a separate opinion; Judge SIMONS dissents and votes to reverse in another opinion in which Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judge HANCOCK, JR., concur.


ALEXANDER, J.

In this action for legal malpractice, defendant attorneys seek to offset against any damages recoverable by the plaintiff clients, the contingent fee provided for in the retainer agreement executed between them in respect to the underlying personal injury claim. We hold that in the circumstances of this case, such an offset is impermissible.

I

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases