The United States appeals an order of the district court granting Rogers' motion to suppress his confession. The district court found that Rogers made the statements while in custody and that the government failed to prove that the statement was made pursuant to a voluntary waiver of Rogers' rights after he received proper warnings in accordance with Miranda v. State of Arizona,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
U.S. v. ROGERS
No. 89-4872.
906 F.2d 189 (1990)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hermon D. ROGERS, Defendant-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 23, 1990.
July 23, 1990.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Robert H. Norman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Robert O. Whitwell, U.S. Atty., Oxford, Miss., for plaintiff-appellant.
Joseph P. Langston, Ronald Michael, Langston & Langston, Booneville, Miss., for defendant-appellee.
Before GARZA, HIGGINBOTHAM, AND DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
