ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, Plaintiff,
v.
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, Rhone-Poulenc Inc., Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie, and Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, Defendants.
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, Rhone-Poulenc Inc., Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie, and Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, Plaintiffs,
v.
ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, Defendant.
United States District Court, D. Delaware.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 30, 1989.
June 30, 1989.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Rudolf E. Hutz, Januar D. Bove, Jr. and Mary W. Bourke of Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz, Wilmington, Del., William E. Lambert III and Terence P. Strobaugh, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel, for Rohm and Haas Co.
Charles S. Crompton, Jr. of Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, Del., John A. Diaz, J. Robert Dailey, Arnold I. Rady, Jean M. Duvall and Shahan Islam of Morgan & Finnegan, New York City, of counsel, for Mobil Oil Corp., Rhone-Poulenc, Inc., Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie, and Rhone-Poulenc AG Co.
United States District Court, D. Delaware.
OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
These consolidated actions1 involve the validity and infringement of six U.S. patents issued over the past 13 years. The actions were filed by the Rohm and Haas Company2 on September 11, 1978 (C.A. No. 78-384-JLL) seeking a declaratory judgment that one of the patents in suit, U.S. Patent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.