ROHM AND HAAS CO. v. MOBIL OIL CORP.

Civ. A. Nos. 78-384-JLL, 79-397-JLL.

718 F.Supp. 274 (1989)

ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, Rhone-Poulenc Inc., Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie, and Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, Defendants. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, Rhone-Poulenc Inc., Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie, and Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, Plaintiffs, v. ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

June 30, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rudolf E. Hutz, Januar D. Bove, Jr. and Mary W. Bourke of Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz, Wilmington, Del., William E. Lambert III and Terence P. Strobaugh, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel, for Rohm and Haas Co.

Charles S. Crompton, Jr. of Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, Del., John A. Diaz, J. Robert Dailey, Arnold I. Rady, Jean M. Duvall and Shahan Islam of Morgan & Finnegan, New York City, of counsel, for Mobil Oil Corp., Rhone-Poulenc, Inc., Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie, and Rhone-Poulenc AG Co.


OPINION

LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

These consolidated actions1 involve the validity and infringement of six U.S. patents issued over the past 13 years. The actions were filed by the Rohm and Haas Company2 on September 11, 1978 (C.A. No. 78-384-JLL) seeking a declaratory judgment that one of the patents in suit, U.S. Patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases