We granted review to address "[o]ne of the most controversial questions of classification" for purposes of taxation in the law of fixtures, that of electronic data processing equipment. (1 Ehrman & Flavin, Taxing Cal. Property (3d ed. 1988) § 3:04, p. 10; see Allstate Ins. Co. v. County of Los Angeles (1984)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CROCKER NATIONAL BANK v. CITY & CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO
49 Cal.3d 881 (1989)
782 P.2d 278
264 Cal. Rptr. 139
CROCKER NATIONAL BANK, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant and Appellant.
Supreme Court of California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 30, 1989.
November 30, 1989.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Morrison & Foerster, William Alsup and Charles J. Moll III for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Philip M. Plant, Barbara L. Rosenfeld, Ehrman, Flavin, Devine & Baker, Sean Flavin, Kenneth A. Ehrman, R. Blair Reynolds, Stephens, Berg, Lasater, Schulman & Rogers and Mark G. Ancel as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
Louise H. Renne, City Attorney, and John J. Doherty, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.