U.S. v. ULLOA

Nos. 1080, 1157. Docket Nos. 88-1401, 88-1517.

882 F.2d 41 (1989)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Antonio ULLOA and Adolpho Transito, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided August 9, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry Weinstein, New York City (Mordkofsky, Goldstein & Weinstein, on the brief), for defendant-appellant Ulloa.

Anthony Suarez, New York City (Suarez & Canals, on the brief), for defendant-appellant Transito.

Kerri Martin Bartlett, New York City (Benito Romano, U.S. Atty., Robert W. Ray, Daniel C. Richman, Asst. U.S. Attys., New York City, on the brief), for U.S.

Before FEINBERG and NEWMAN, Circuit Judges, and TENNEY, District Judge.


JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:

In United States v. Ronder, 639 F.2d 931 (2d Cir.1981), this Court set forth the procedure that a trial judge should normally follow in responding to an inquiry from a jury during the course of jury deliberations. On this appeal, we consider primarily whether a new trial is warranted because a trial judge, in the course of responding in open court to a jury's written inquiries, engaged in a colloquy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases