Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial by the admission of explicit and implicit bolstering testimony. We disagree. First, the defendant's claims of implicit bolstering are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Medina,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.