1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 767 P.2d
  5. 767 P.2d 94 (1989)
 

HARTMAN v. ADULT AND FAMILY SERVICES

G4-3401-AK2720-6 (Control), N2-1701-AK1413-9, N2-3401-4PH341-7; CA A45545 (Control), A45546, A45547.

767 P.2d 94 (1989)

94 Or.App. 690

Bernice HARTMAN, Petitioner, v. ADULT AND FAMILY SERVICES Division, Respondent. Richard and Frances Moon, Petitioners, v. ADULT AND FAMILY SERVICES DIVISION, Respondent. Francisco Rodriguez, Petitioner, v. ADULT AND FAMILY SERVICES Division, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 11, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kent B. Thurber, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

Christine Chute, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.

DEITS, Judge.

Petitioners are three public aid recipients who, before July 1, 1986, had received medical assistance from Adult and Family Services Division (AFSD) under its General Assistance Medical Only (GAMO) program. They seek review of final orders terminating their benefits under that program. We affirm.

In May, 1986, AFSD notified petitioners that, effective July 1, 1986, they would no longer be eligible for the GAMO program,1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases