SENTRY INS. CO. v. KERO-SUN, INC.


154 A.D.2d 662 (1989)

Sentry Insurance Company, as Subrogee of William C. Haldenwang, Respondent, v. Kero-Sun, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. Toyotomi Kogyo Co., Ltd., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 30, 1989


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff-respondent.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting leave to renew (see, Vitale v La Cour, 92 A.D.2d 892). The new evidence offered was obtained pursuant to court-ordered disclosure during the pendency of the appellant's motion for summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases