NEITZKE v. WILLIAMS

No. 87-1882.

490 U.S. 319 (1989)

NEITZKE ET AL. v. WILLIAMS

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 1, 1989


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert S. Spear argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was Linley E. Pearson, Attorney General of Indiana, and David A. Nowak, Deputy Attorney General.

George A. Rutherglen, by appointment of the Court, 488 U.S. 939, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.


JUSTICE MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question presented is whether a complaint filed in forma pauperis which fails to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is automatically frivolous within the meaning of 28 U. S. C. § 1915(d). The answer, we hold, is no.

I

On October 27, 1986, respondent Harry Williams, Sr., an inmate in the custody of the Indiana Department of Corrections, filed a complaint...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases