BURNESS v. BRUCE

E85-2140; CA A47121.

776 P.2d 32 (1989)

97 Or.App. 298

William S. BURNESS, Respondent, v. Gerry E. BRUCE, Aka Gerald E. Bruce and Jerry E. Bruce, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 21, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Darryl E. Johnson, Roseburg, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

William C. Wolke, Roseburg, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Wolke & Mays, Roseburg.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


DEITS, Judge.

Defendant appeals a judgment for plaintiff on his claims for breach of contract, for foreclosure of a security interest and for defendant on his counterclaim. We remand for entry of a judgment not inconsistent with this opinion.

In September, 1980, plaintiff and defendant entered into two contracts. The first was a stock sale agreement in which plaintiff agreed to sell defendant all outstanding common stock in his automobile dealership for $261...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases