DIGITAL & ANALOG DESIGN CORP. v. NORTH SUPPLY CO.

No. 88-107.

44 Ohio St. 3d 36 (1989)

DIGITAL & ANALOG DESIGN CORPORATION, APPELLEE, v. NORTH SUPPLY COMPANY, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 5, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wickens, Herzer & Panza, Richard D. Panza, William F. Kolis, Jr., and Thomas A. Downie, for appellee.

Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Forrest A. Norman, John B. Robertson and Robert H. Eddy, for appellant.

Murray & Murray Co., L.P.A., Dennis E. Murray and Kirk J. Delli Bovi, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Nick J. Miller et al.

Lucal & McGookey and James E. McGookey, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Wikel Mfg. Co., Inc.


HOLMES, J.

The thrust of appellant's propositions of law seeks review of the damages awarded, both compensatory and punitive. In analyzing such claimed errors, we must proceed being cognizant that the damage awards were made by this jury which had expressed its findings by way of its affirmative answers to the aforestated interrogatories.

I

In its first proposition of law, regarding compensatory damages, NSC asserts that DAD's business finance expert...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases