JEMISON v. CRICHLOW


74 N.Y.2d 726 (1989)

Marie R. Jemison, Individually and on Behalf of Marie S. Jemison and Others, et al., Appellants, v. Grantley E. Crichlow, Individually, as a Licensed Process Server and as a City Marshal, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided June 30, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel A. Siegel for appellants.

Harry Blum for Grantley E. Crichlow, respondent.

Peter L. Zimroth, Corporation Counsel, for City of New York, respondent.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur in memorandum.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.

We agree with so much of the opinion of Justice Lawrence J. Bracken at the Appellate Division (139 A.D.2d 332) that holds that actions against the City Marshal for acts done in an official capacity or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases