Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Upon our review of the record we find that defendant was not denied his statutory right to a speedy trial. After subtracting the periods of delay directly resulting from the defendant's unavailability due to his detention in Connecticut (CPL 30.30 [4] [e]); the delay directly resulting from the defendant's
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.