Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
On appeal the defendant contends that the circumstantial evidence against him was insufficient, as a matter of law, to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The standard for reviewing the legal sufficiency of circumstantial evidence requires that "`the facts from which the inference of the defendant's guilt is drawn must be established with certainty — they must be inconsistent with his innocence and must exclude...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
