1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 74 N.Y.2d
  5. 74 N.Y.2d 653 (1989)
 

PEOPLE v. BARBER

74 N.Y.2d 653 (1989)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Arthur Barber, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided May 9, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lynn W. L. Fahey, Philip L. Weinstein and Andrea Hirsch for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney (Susan L. Valle, Stacey K. Edelbaum and Billie Manning of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur; Judge TITONE dissents and votes to reverse in an opinion.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant had no right to file a supplemental pro se brief in the Appellate Division and under the circumstances presented we find no abuse of discretion by the court in denying him permission to do so (see, People v White, 73 N.Y.2d 468 [decided herewith]). We have considered defendant's remaining...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases