Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion to strike is denied, and the cross motion for partial summary judgment is granted.
Contrary to the plaintiff's contentions, the dental services provided by the defendant, over a period of approximately 18 years, did not constitute continuous treatment for purposes of tolling the Statute of Limitations until the date of their last consultation (see, Wehle v Giovanniello,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.