Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
The Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiff's 11th and 12th causes of action, which alleged that during the period from May 26, 1986 through June 6, 1986, the defendants had employed undercover agents to spy on and to seduce the plaintiff and placed a wiretap on his telephone, were predicated solely on mere conclusory statements, unsupported by factual allegations (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.