1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 298 S.C.
  5. 298 S.C. 309 (1989)
 

HAMM v. S.C. PSC

23022

298 S.C. 309 (1989)

380 S.E.2d 428

Steven W. HAMM, Consumer Advocate for the State of South Carolina, Appellant v. SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and South Carolina Electric and Gas Company, Respondents.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided May 30, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Consumer Advocate Steven W. Hamm, Asst. Consumer Advocate Raymon E. Lark, Jr., and Staff Atty. F. David Butler, all of Department of Consumer Affairs, Columbia, for appellant.

Sarena D. Burch, Columbia, for respondent South Carolina Public Service Com'n.

Belton T. Zeigler, Inez Moore Tenenbaum, and Frank W. Cureton, all of Sinkler & Boyd, P.A., and Patricia T. Smith, Columbia, for respondent South Carolina Elec. and Gas Co.

Heard March 21, 1989.

Decided May 30, 1989.

Per Curiam:

The appellant (Consumer Advocate) appeals two orders of the South Carolina Public Service Commission (the PSC) granting South Carolina Electric and Gas's (SCE&G's) application for certain accounting adjustments relative to its rate base. We vacate and remand.

FACTS

In Hamm v. South Carolina Public Service Com'n,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases