PARMAR v. SKINNER


154 A.D.2d 444 (1989)

Aditya Parmar, by His Guardian ad Litem and Natural Mother, Sneh Parmar, Appellant, v. William Skinner et al., Defendants, and Emanuel Milton et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 10, 1989


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a single trial on the issues of both liability and damages. We disagree.

As a general rule, questions of liability and damages in a negligence action represent distinct and severable issues which should be tried and determined separately (see, Louise B. G. v New...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases